Stromal fibroblast-derived miR-409 promotes epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition and prostate tumorigenesis.

Tumor-stromal interaction is a dynamic process that promotes tumor growth and metastasis via cell-cell interaction and extracellular vesicles. Recent studies demonstrate that stromal fibroblast-derived molecular signatures can be used to predict disease progression and drug resistance. To identify the epigenetic role of stromal noncoding RNAs in tumor-stromal interactions in the tumor microenvironment, we performed microRNA profiling of patient cancer-associated prostate stromal fibroblasts isolated by laser capture dissection microscopy and in bone-associated stromal models. We found specific upregulation of miR-409-3p and miR-409-5p located within the embryonically and developmentally regulated DLK1-DIO3 (delta-like 1 homolog-deiodinase, iodothyronine 3) cluster on human chromosome 14. The findings in cell lines were further validated in human prostate cancer tissues. Strikingly, ectopic expression of miR-409 in normal prostate fibroblasts conferred a cancer-associated stroma-like phenotype and led to the release of miR-409 via extracellular vesicles to promote tumor induction and epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition in vitro and in vivo. miR-409 promoted tumorigenesis through repression of tumor suppressor genes such as Ras suppressor 1 and stromal antigen 2. Thus, stromal fibroblasts derived miR-409-induced tumorigenesis, epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition and stemness of the epithelial cancer cells in vivo. Therefore, miR-409 appears to be an attractive therapeutic target to block the vicious cycle of tumor-stromal interactions that plagues prostate cancer patients.

A phase 1 Bayesian dose selection study of bortezomib and sunitinib in patients with refractory solid tumor malignancies.

BACKGROUND: This phase 1 trial utilising a Bayesian continual reassessment method evaluated bortezomib and sunitinib to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), dose-limiting toxicities (DLT), and recommended doses of the combination. METHODS: Patients with advanced solid organ malignancies were enrolled and received bortezomib weekly with sunitinib daily for 4 weeks, every 6 weeks. Initial doses were sunitinib 25 mg and bortezomib 1 mg m(-2). Cohort size and dose level estimation was performed utilising the Escalation with Overdose Control (EWOC) adaptive method. Seven dose levels were evaluated; initially, sunitinib was increased to a goal dose of 50 mg with fixed bortezomib, then bortezomib was increased. Efficacy assessment occurred after each cycle using RECIST criteria. RESULTS: Thirty patients were evaluable. During sunitinib escalation, DLTs of grade 4 thrombocytopenia (14%) and neutropenia (6%) at sunitinib 50 mg and bortezomib 1.3 mg m(-2) were seen. Subsequent experience showed tolerability and activity for sunitinib 37.5 mg and bortezomib 1.9 mg m(-2). Common grade 3/4 toxicities were neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, hypertension, and diarrhoea. The recommended doses for further study are bortezomib 1.9 mg m(-2) and sunitinib 37.5 mg. Four partial responses were seen. Stable disease >6 months was noted in an additional six patients. CONCLUSION: Bortezomib and sunitinib are well tolerated and have anticancer activity, particularly in thyroid cancer. A phase 2 study of this combination in thyroid cancer patients is planned.

Measurable immune dysfunction and telomere attrition in long-term allogeneic transplant recipients.

This study was conducted to determine if the accelerated telomere attrition that occurs as a consequence of allogeneic stem cell transplantation leads to measurable functional defects. Telomere lengths in mononuclear leukocytes obtained from 15 long-term allogeneic stem cell transplant recipients and their respective donors were determined by Southern hybridization and densitometric analysis. Functional assays evaluated the ability of these cells to proliferate in response to a mitogenic stimulus and to differentiate under appropriate cytokine stimulation. Lymphocyte proliferation in response to phytohemagglutinin was determined by measurement of (3)[H]thymidine uptake. The ability of circulating myeloid cells to differentiate was determined after incubation of peripheral blood mononuclear cells with IL-3 and GM-CSF. A total of 13 patients demonstrated telomeric loss, ranging from 0.1 to 3.7 kbp. Strikingly, lymphocytes from 14 of the 15 patients demonstrated a significant decrease in proliferation when compared to their respective donors (68%+/-22, P=0.001). All patients demonstrated at least a 50% decrease in the number of myeloid colony-forming units when compared to their respective donors (P<0.0001). A decreased ability of hematopoietic cells to proliferate and differentiate is phenotypically consistent with an aged immune system. This may correlate with diminished clinically relevant immune responses to infection or vaccination, as seen in the elderly.

Phase II Trial of Dolastatin-10, a Novel Anti-Tubulin Agent, in Metastatic Soft Tissue Sarcomas.

PATIENTS: Soft tissue sarcomas are uncommon malignancies with few therapeutic options for recurrent or metastatic disease. Dolastatin-10 (Dol-10) is a pentapeptide anti-microtubule agent that binds to tubulin sites distinct from vinca alkaloids. Based on the novel mechanism of action, limited activity of other anti-microtubular agents, and anti-neoplastic activity in pre-clinical screening of Dol-10, this multi-institutional phase II study was conducted to determine the objective response rate of Dol-10 in recurrent or metastatic soft tissue sarcomas that had not been treated with chemotherapy outside of the adjuvant setting. METHODS: Dol-10 was given intravenously at a dose of 400 mug/m(2) and repeated every 21 days. Toxicities were assessed using the Common Toxicity Criteria (version 2.0). Radiographic studies and tumor measurements were repeated every two cycles to assess response [Miller AB, et al. Cancer 1981; 47(1): 207]. RESULTS: Dol-10 was associated with hematological toxicity and with some vascular toxicities. There was no significant gastrointestinal, hepatic or renal toxicity. There was one death on study due to respiratory failure. There were no objective responses in 12 patients treated with Dol-10. DISCUSSION: Based on this phase II trial, further study of Dol-10 on this schedule is not recommended in advanced or metastatic soft tissue sarcomas.

Phase I trial of weekly paclitaxel plus oral estramustine phosphate in patients with hormone-refractory prostate cancer.

OBJECTIVES: To exploit the favorable dose intensity and safety profile of weekly paclitaxel, we conducted a Phase I trial of paclitaxel by 3-hour infusion in combination with estramustine phosphate (EM) in men with hormone-refractory prostate cancer (HRPC). The antimicrotubule drug combination of paclitaxel by 96-hour infusion plus EM is active in HRPC. METHODS: Twenty-four patients with metastatic HRPC and progressive tumor after antiandrogen withdrawal were enrolled in this study. Oral EM was taken at a dose of 600 mg/m(2) daily for the initial 21 patients and on a reduced schedule of 280 mg twice daily for the final 3 patients. Paclitaxel was escalated from 60 to 118 mg/m(2). RESULTS: The major toxicities were gastrointestinal and thromboembolic complications related to daily oral dosing of EM. Of the first 21 patients, one third (n = 7) discontinued therapy within 4 weeks because of protracted nausea and/or thrombotic complications. Dose-limiting toxicities at 118 mg/m(2) paclitaxel were fatigue and hepatotoxicity. Of 13 patients with measurable soft-tissue lesions, 6 had objective partial regressions, and 9 (37.5%) of 24 patients (95% confidence interval 19.1% to 59.1%) with elevated prostate-specific antigen levels had a 50% or greater decline of at least 4 weeks' duration. CONCLUSIONS: Weekly paclitaxel at doses of 60 to 107 mg/m(2) were feasible in combination with oral EM, but daily oral EM produced unacceptable toxicity. On the basis of these results, a Phase II trial of weekly paclitaxel with the reduced dose and schedule of EM was initiated by the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group to assess further the benefits and risks of this treatment in men with metastatic HRPC.

Patient specific dosing in a cancer phase I clinical trial.

Recent improvements in our understanding of drug metabolism have led to the development of anticancer therapies that accommodate patient differences in drug tolerance. Such methods adjust the dose level according to measurable patient characteristics in order to obtain a target drug exposure. This paper describes the utilization of a patient specific dosing scheme in the statistical design of a phase I clinical trial involving patients with advanced adenocarcinomas of gastrointestinal origin. During the trial, dose levels were adjusted according to each patient's pretreatment concentration of an antibody that was shown in preclinical testing to moderate the effect of the agent under investigation. The design of the trial permitted a continual adjustment of the model used to tailor the dose to each patient's individual needs.

The influence of granulocyte macrophage colony-stimulating factor and prior chemotherapy on the immunological response to a vaccine (ALVAC-CEA B7.1) in patients with metastatic carcinoma.

Granulocyte macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) has been shown to be an effective vaccine adjuvant because it enhances antigen processing and presentation by dendritic cells. ALVAC-CEA B7.1 is a canarypox virus encoding the gene for the tumor-associated antigen carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and for a T-cell costimulatory molecule, B7.1. After an initial dose escalation phase, this study evaluated vaccination with 4.5 x 10(8) plaque-forming units ALVAC-CEA B7.1 alone (n = 30) or with GM-CSF (n = 30) in patients with advanced CEA-expressing tumors to determine whether the addition of the adjuvant GM-CSF enhances induction of CEA-specific T-cells. Patients were vaccinated with vaccine intradermally every other week for 8 weeks. GM-CSF was given s.c. for 5 days beginning 2 days before vaccination. Patients with stable or responding disease after four immunizations received monthly boost injections alone or with GM-CSF. Biopsies of vaccine sites were obtained 48 h after vaccination to evaluate leukocytic infiltration and CEA expression. Induction of peripheral blood CEA-specific T-cell precursors was assessed in HLA-A2 positive patients by an ELISPOT assay looking for the production of IFN-gamma. Therapy was well tolerated. All of the patients had evidence of leukocytic infiltration and CEA expression in vaccine biopsy sites. In the patients receiving GM-CSF, leukocytic infiltrates were greater in cell number but were less likely to have a predominant lymphocytic infiltrate compared with patients receiving vaccine in the absence of the cytokine adjuvant. After four vaccinations, CEA-specific T-cell precursors were statistically increased in HLA-A2 positive patients who received vaccine alone. However, the GM-CSF plus vaccine cohort of HLA-A2 positive did not demonstrate a statistically significant increase in their CEA-specific T-cell precursor frequencies compared with baseline results. The number of prior chemotherapy regimens was negatively correlated with the generation of a T-cell response, whereas there was a positive correlation between the number of months from the last chemotherapy regimen and the T-cell response. ALVAC-CEA B7.1 is safe in patients with advanced, recurrent adenocarcinomas that express CEA, is associated with the induction of a CEA-specific T-cell response in patients treated with vaccine alone but not with vaccine and GM-CSF, and can lead to disease stabilization for up to 13 months.

Vascular endothelial growth factor and soft tissue sarcomas: tumor expression correlates with grade.

INTRODUCTION: Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), an endothelial-specific mitogen overexpressed in various epithelial malignancies is thought to be a potent regulator of angiogenesis. We hypothesized that some soft tissue sarcomas, due to their high propensity for hematogenous metastases (1) would overexpress VEGF, (2) that the degree of expression may represent a significant biologic predictor for disease-specific survival, and (3) that recurrent tumor would express as high or higher VEGF compared with the primary tumor. METHODS: Selected paraffin-embedded tissue of surgical specimens from 79 patients with soft tissue sarcomas, treated between 1989 and 1995 were stained with a rabbit polyclonal anti-VEGF antibody at a concentration of 2 microg/ml. Slides were assessed for VEGF expression as high or low by two investigators blinded to the clinicopathologic data. Twelve patients had VEGF expression of their primary tumors, and their recurrent tumors were compared. The Fishers' exact test assessed for differences in VEGF expression; survival analyses were performed according to the methods of Kaplan and Meier. RESULTS: Seventy-eight percent (29 of 37) of patients who died of disease had high VEGF expression. However, VEGF expression was not an independent predictor of either overall or disease-free survival. Tumor grade correlated with VEGF expression significantly. For the low-grade tumors, 7 of 13 expressed low VEGF, whereas for high-grade tumors, 53 of 66 expressed high VEGF (P = .016). Seven of the 12 paired tumor samples expressed identical VEGF immunostaining. CONCLUSIONS: The majority of high-grade soft tissue sarcomas in this study have high intensity VEGF expression. This finding may provide useful information on individual soft tissue sarcomas and offer the basis for therapeutic and biologic targeting in high-risk patients using anti-angiogenesis strategies. However, in our analysis, after accounting for tumor grade, VEGF does not seem to be an independent predictor of clinical outcome.

Phase I trial of multiple cycles of high-dose carboplatin, paclitaxel, and topotecan with peripheral-blood stem-cell support as front-line therapy.

PURPOSE: To determine the safety and feasibility of delivering multiple cycles of front-line high-dose carboplatin, paclitaxel, and topotecan with peripheral-blood stem-cell (PBSC) support. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients were required to have a malignant solid tumor for which they had received no prior chemotherapy. Mobilization of PBSC was achieved with either filgrastim alone or in combination with cyclophosphamide and paclitaxel. Patients then received three or four cycles of high-dose carboplatin (area under the concentration-time curve [AUC] 16), paclitaxel (250 mg/m(2)), and topotecan (10-15 mg/m(2)), with the latter two agents administered as 24-hour infusions and supported with PBSC and filgrastim. Cycles were repeated every 28 days. RESULTS: Twenty patients were enrolled onto the trial and were assessable for toxicity and clinical outcome. Dose-limiting toxicities were stomatitis and prolonged hematopoietic recovery. The maximum-tolerated dose of topotecan was 12.5 mg/m(2) when given with high-dose carboplatin and paclitaxel for three cycles. Four cycles were able to be given with a dose of topotecan of 10 mg/m(2). The pharmacokinetics of each compound were not affected by the other agents. Eleven (85%) of 13 patients with assessable disease responded. CONCLUSION: Multiple cycles of high-dose carboplatin, paclitaxel, and topotecan can be safely administered with filgrastim and PBSC support. The recommended doses for phase II study are carboplatin AUC 16, paclitaxel 250 mg/m(2), and topotecan 10 mg/m(2). Trials are currently being conducted with this regimen as front-line treatment in patients with advanced ovarian cancer and extensive small-cell carcinoma. This approach remains experimental and should be used only in the context of a clinical trial.

Pilot study of a dual gene recombinant avipox vaccine containing both carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and B7.1 transgenes in patients with recurrent CEA-expressing adenocarcinomas.

Coordinated presentation of antigen and costimulatory molecules has been shown to result in the induction of an antigen-specific T-cell response rather than the development of anergy. This study evaluated the vaccine ALVAC-CEA B7.1, a canary pox virus that has been engineered to encode the gene for the tumor-associated antigen carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and B7.1, a T-cell costimulatory molecule. Patients with CEA-expressing tumors were immunized with 2.5 x 10(7) (n = 3), 1.0 x 10(8) (n = 6), and 4.5 x 10(8) (n = 30) plaque-forming units intradermally every other week for 8 weeks. Patients with stable or responding disease received monthly boost injections. Biopsies of vaccine sites were obtained 48 h after vaccination to evaluate leukocytic infiltration and CEA expression. Induction of CEA-specific T-cell precursors was assessed by an ELISPOT assay looking for the production of IFN-gamma. Therapy was well tolerated, without significant toxicity attributable to vaccine. All patients had evidence of leukocytic infiltration and CEA expression in vaccine biopsy sites. Six patients with elevated serum CEA values at baseline had declines in their levels lasting 4-12 weeks. These patients all had stable disease after four vaccinations. After four vaccinations, patients who were HLA-A-2-positive demonstrated increases in their CEA-specific T-cell precursor frequencies to a CEA-A2-binding peptide from baseline. The number of prior chemotherapy regimens was inversely correlated with the ability to generate a T-cell response. ALVAC-CEA B7.1 is safe in patients with advanced, recurrent adenocarcinomas that express CEA, and it is associated with the induction of a CEA-specific T-cell response.

Phase II trial of induction high-dose chemotherapy followed by surgical resection and radiation therapy for patients with marginally resectable non-small cell carcinoma of the lung.

The combination of carboplatin and paclitaxel is an active regimen in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Historically, patients with stage III disease have manifested higher response rates than patients with metastatic disease, and patients achieving a pathologic complete response to induction chemoradiation therapy prior to surgery have shown better long-term outcome. Based upon our pilot data using high-dose carboplatin and paclitaxel, we designed a phase II trial in patients with marginally resectable stage IIIA NSCLC. Ten patients, with bulky nodal stage IIIA disease, initially received etoposide (2 g/m2) and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) to mobilize peripheral blood stem cells (PBSC). Two cycles, 28 days apart, of carboplatin (AUC 12 in seven patients; AUC 16 in three patients) and paclitaxel (250 mg/m2) were administered with filgrastim (5 microg/kg) and PBSC support. After re-evaluation, patients underwent a thoracotomy followed by radiotherapy (44-60 Gy) if deemed resectable, or radiotherapy alone (60 Gy) if not resectable. The median age was 58.5 years (48-66) with a median ECOG performance status of 0 (0-1). Histology was adenocarcinoma in seven patients; the remainder had either squamous cell, large cell or bronchoalveolar carcinoma. Based on CT radiography, the overall response rate was 40%. Eight of ten patients underwent resection with four right pneumonectomies, three right upper lobectomies and one wedge resection of the right upper lobe. Six patients had a complete resection. Of eight patients resected, four were downstaged by induction therapy, three remained unchanged and one was found to have more extensive disease. The remaining two patients developed metastatic disease while receiving chemotherapy. The median dose of postoperative radiotherapy was 54 Gy (35-66 Gy). Actual median follow-up for all patients was 89 weeks (25 to 136+). The actuarial median overall survival was 124 weeks (25 to 136+) and time to progression was 57 weeks (17 to 136+). The median dose of carboplatin delivered expressed as mg/m2 was 779 (615-1540). Neutropenic fever occurred in two patients during the initial mobilization cycle only. The median number of units of RBC and/or platelets transfused was 0 (0-2 and 0-6, respectively). There were no significant non-hematologic toxicities. High-dose induction chemotherapy with stem cell rescue is feasible and safe with an acceptable response rate. Thoracotomy, including pneumonectomy and postoperative radiotherapy, were well tolerated by patients after undergoing high-dose induction chemotherapy with no apparent increase in peri-operative morbidity. The pathologic complete response rate was low--one out of ten patients. These results indicate that dose escalation of induction chemotherapy does not improve response rates even in this highly selected patient population. Accordingly, the complexity and potential toxicity of high-dose chemotherapy, as delivered in this trial as neoadjuvant treatment of non-small cell lung cancer, is not warranted.

Allelic instability as a predictor of survival in Egyptian breast cancer patients.

This work was designed with the purpose of determining whether the presence of allelic imbalances (AI) such as microsatellite instability (MSI) and loss of heterozygosity (LOH) in chromosomes 2, 11, 13, and 17 in primary breast cancer could be used as prognostic indicators of patient survival. The DNA from breast cancers removed from 29 patients who were followed-up for up to five years was analyzed for MSI and LOH using a panel of 24 markers located at chromosome 2 (TPO, D2S131, D2S144, D2S171, D2S177, D2S119, D2S123, D2S147 and D2S136), chromosome 11 (C-RAS, Int-2, D11S940, D11S912), chromosome 13 (D13S289, D13S260, D13S267, D13S218, D13S263, D13S155, and D13S162), and chromosome 17 (D17S513, TP53, D17S855, and D17S785). The frequency of AI in the markers studied ranged from 30-55%, being highest for D11S912, D2S171, TP53 and D17S855. Univariate analysis showed association between overall survival rate and AI in 9 out of the 24 markers tested. Five of them were located at the area of the mismatch repair gene (MMR)-2 gene, two at 11p, one at 13q and one at 17p. Using multivariate analysis, it was observed that only pathological and clinical stage (defined as stage II or not) and AI at D2S171, D11S912, or D17STP53 generated significant predictive models for survival.

Exploring family relationships in cancer risk counseling using the genogram.

OBJECTIVES: The genogram is a tool that has facilitated counseling in family therapy and social work for many years. It is hypothesized that genograms may also be useful in genetic counseling, because they help the counselor to acquire more objective and consistent information from the client, as well as to incorporate family dynamics and psychosocial issues into the counseling approach. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A pilot study of genograms used as an adjunct to genetic counseling was performed at Fox Chase Cancer Center's Family Risk Assessment Program. A questionnaire was developed to elicit genograms from 38 women at risk for familial breast and/or ovarian cancer. After standard pedigree expansion, a series of questions was asked about the consultand's relationship with other family members, communication patterns within the family, attitudes toward genetic testing, family reactions to cancer, roles individuals play in the family, and significant historical or anniversary events. Relationships were defined by the consultand as close, very close, conflictual, fused and conflictual, distant, or estranged. RESULTS: The majority of relationship types reported by 38 individuals was "very close" or "close." Eighty-one % reported having close/very close relationships with their spouses, 83% reported close/very close relationships with their mothers, and 70% reported close/very close relationships with their fathers. The degree of familial cohesion as depicted by the genogram correlates positively with scores obtained on the standardized Social Adjustment Scale Self-Report (P = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Given the family-wide implications of genetic testing, the genogram may offer important guidance in family-targeted interventions.

Constructing meiotic maps with known error probability.

We propose methods to construct meiotic gene maps while controlling the probability of a decision-error. First, a single step gene ordering procedure is presented whose decision-error probability is bounded above by a prespecified threshold. The bound for the error probability is valid under quite general circumstances. The ordering procedure is optimal in the sense of having maximal predictive probability of correct ordering among all procedures subject to the same bound on the error probability. Second, to reduce the number of hypotheses to be tested, a stepwise ordering procedure is presented. A Monte Carlo simulation study demonstrated the integrity of the proposed error bound for the stepwise procedure under a wide variety of situations, including data coming from different laboratories and marker typing errors. The stepwise procedure was applied to version 2 of the public database maintained by the Cooperative Human Linkage Center and maps of the 23 chromosomes were generated such that the probability that the order of the markers in a given chromosome is incorrect is less than 1%.

Cancer phase I clinical trials: efficient dose escalation with overdose control.

We describe an adaptive dose escalation scheme for use in cancer phase I clinical trials. The method is fully adaptive, makes use of all the information available at the time of each dose assignment, and directly addresses the ethical need to control the probability of overdosing. It is designed to approach the maximum tolerated dose as fast as possible subject to the constraint that the predicted proportion of patients who receive an overdose does not exceed a specified value. We conducted simulations to compare the proposed method with four up-and-down designs, two stochastic approximation methods, and with a variant of the continual reassessment method. The results showed the proposed method effective as a means to control the frequency of overdosing. Relative to the continual reassessment method, our scheme overdosed a smaller proportion of patients, exhibited fewer toxicities and estimated the maximum tolerated dose with comparable accuracy. When compared to the non-parametric schemes, our method treated fewer patients at either subtherapeutic or severely toxic dose levels, treated more patients at optimal dose levels and estimated the maximum tolerated dose with smaller average bias and mean squared error. Hence, the proposed method is promising alternative to currently used cancer phase I clinical trial designs.

Prediction of recurrence and survival by post-resection CA 19-9 values in patients with adenocarcinoma of the pancreas.

BACKGROUND: CA 19-9 levels are useful for the diagnosis of patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma. However, interest has recently turned toward its use as a prognostic indicator. The purpose of this study is to determine whether postoperative CA 19-9 levels predict disease-free survival (DFS) and median survival (MS) in patients after resection. METHODS: Between 1988 and 1996, 40 patients underwent resection for pancreatic adenocarcinoma and were evaluated with postoperative CA 19-9 assays. Eight patients had low preoperative levels of CA 19-9 (< 2) and were excluded. RESULTS: CA 19-9 levels are good predictors of DFS and MS. Patients whose postoperative CA 19-9 values normalized by 3 to 6 months (< 37 U/ml) had longer DFS (24 vs. 10 months, p < 0.04) and MS (34 vs. 13 months, p < 0.04). Patients with postoperative CA 19-9 values less than 180 U/ml at 1 to 3 months had a similar DFS (19 vs. 5 months, p < 0.0009) and MS (34 vs. 13 months, p < 0.0001) compared to patients with normal values at 3 to 6 months. CONCLUSIONS: Postoperative measurements of CA 19-9 were the best predictors of DFS and MS. Values < 180 U/ml at 3 months were as predictive as normal values by 3 to 6 months postoperatively. Consequently, CA 19-9 levels should be obtained for use as a stratification parameter in phase III trials.

Utility of linked markers in genetic counseling: estimation of carrier risks in X-linked ocular albinism.

We apply a method proposed by Rogatko et al. [1995: Am J Med Genet 59:24-32] to estimate carrier risks using genetic linkage data. The method is illustrated for X-linked ocular albinism. Linkage data from pedigrees were combined with genome mapping data to compute carrier risks for individuals with unknown carrier status based on pedigree data alone. We considered two situations. First, a linkage map with some ambiguity in the gene order was considered. This analysis allows us to examine the effect of incomplete genetic map information on risk computations. Second, published physical and meiotic mapping information was used to derive a linkage map that could be assumed known without ambiguity. In both situations, the mean and median estimate of carrier risk differed significantly from that obtained using pedigree relationships only, in that the computed risk was significantly different from the a priori value of 0.5. The 95% CI's associated with point estimates of risk made using the known map or an map with ambiguity did not overlap in some cases. These results suggest that the risk estimate and the confidence with which a risk estimate can be imparted may depend on the genetic map and marker data used in the risk estimation procedure. We conclude that the method presented here can be used to estimate genetic risk under a variety of analytical conditions.

Evaluation of genotype data in clinical risk assessment: methods and application to BRCA1, BRCA2, and N-acetyl transferase-2 genotypes in breast cancer.

Associations of numerous susceptibility genes with disease risk have been reported. However, objective methods have not been developed to evaluate the conditions under which translation of knowledge about susceptibility genotypes may be clinically informative. We describe and apply a statistical approach to evaluate when genotype information may be clinically informative in disease risk assessment. We estimate an interval of cumulative cancer incidences where it may be appropriate to use these genes in disease risk assessment. We also estimate the magnitude of a log odds ratio (H) that measures genotype-disease association. We illustrate this method with three breast cancer susceptibility genotypes: population screening data evaluating the 185delAG mutation at BRCA1 and the 6174delT mutation at BRCA2 in a Ashkenazi Jewish population, and case control data for the slow acetylation genotype at the N-acetyl transferase 2 (NAT2) gene in combination with smoking. Knowledge of the 185delAG mutation in BRCA1 (HdelAG = 3.42; 95% CI: 3.04, 3.79) or the 6174delT mutation in BRCA2 (HdelT = 1.98; 95% CI: 1.16, 2.30) can be clinically informative in distinguishing individuals who are and are not at breast cancer risk in populations with cumulative breast cancer incidences of > or = 4% and > or = 13%, respectively. NAT2 genotypes alone are much less clinically informative in predicting breast cancer risk (HNAT2 = 0.10). However, knowledge of both heavy smoking 20 years ago and NAT2 genotype is a more clinically informative predictor of postmenopausal breast cancer risk with HNAT2 = 2.19, when the cumulative breast cancer incidence in the target population is at least 31%. These results indicate that knowledge of the 185delG mutation-status may be clinically informative even in populations with low cumulative breast cancer incidences, whereas the 6174delT mutation and NAT2 genotypes may only be clinically informative in a population with higher cumulative breast cancer incidence. The proposed approach can be used to objectively evaluate the conditions under which susceptibility genotypes may be applied for risk assessment or genetic screening.

Evaluation of carboplatin pharmacokinetics in the absence and presence of paclitaxel.

In a clinical trial of paclitaxel (Taxol) and carboplatin in combination, the severity of thrombocytopenia was less than would be expected with an equivalent dose of carboplatin alone. To determine whether a pharmacokinetic interaction was responsible for this observation, the effect of pretreatment with Taxol on the pharmacokinetics of carboplatin was examined in 11 patients. Each patient was randomized to one of two treatment groups that determined the order of drug treatments. The treatments were carboplatin as a 30-min infusion alone or immediately following 175 mg/m2 Taxol administered as a 3-h i.v. infusion. The treatments were separated by 1 week. The carboplatin dose was chosen to produce a target area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) of 3.75 mg-min/ml according to a previously published formula (A. H. Calvert et al., J. Clin Oncol., 7: 1748-1756, 1989). The mean administered dose of carboplatin was 338 mg. Serial blood samples were collected over 24 h and analyzed for total and free platinum, and, in some patients, Taxol. The pharmacokinetics of carboplatin (i.e., total clearance and volume of distribution at steady state), was not significantly affected by pretreatment with Taxol. Total clearances of carboplatin were 67.2 +/- 28.8 ml/min and 64.6 +/- 27.9 ml/min in the absence and presence of Taxol, respectively (P = 0.56). The AUC of free carboplatin (3.45 mg-min/ml) obtained in the absence of Taxol was not significantly different from that measured in the presence of Taxol (3.27 mg-min/ml). The AUC of carboplatin in both the absence and presence of Taxol agreed with the projected target AUC of 3.75 mg-min/ml. In conclusion, the application of an individualized dosing strategy is valid for the calculation of the carboplatin dose in this combination. The pharmacokinetics of carboplatin is not altered by pretreatment with Taxol at a standard dose, and a pharmacokinetic interaction is not responsible for the altered toxicity of the combination.